CLIENT REVENUE GENERATED$9,720,200+Independent consulting · Since 2008
CHATGPT VISIBILITY & OPTIMISATION
I check how ChatGPT describes your business, which competitors appear and whether the answers match what you actually offer. Then I work on the pages, business facts and supporting evidence that need attention.
Check the answers customers may see
Act on gaps in facts, pages and sources
Repeat the checks and record what changed
Himanshu Swaraj
Direct review, planning and implementation
18 years in search marketing
Applied to the information customers use to choose
START WITH THE CUSTOMER’S QUESTION
A useful answer needs to describe the right business, explain the relevant service and give the customer something they can verify.
“Which clinic offers evening appointments near me?”
Service, location and availability matter.“Which supplier can support a small team?”
The answer needs to explain fit.“Does this business offer emergency call-outs?”
A wrong fact can send the wrong enquiry.Example customer questions. I build the checks around your services, customers and markets.
THE REVIEW
I save the question, answer, date and relevant settings. That gives us something specific to investigate and compare later.
MENTIONS
I check relevant questions rather than asking only for your business by name.
BUSINESS FACTS
Services, locations, opening details, prices and qualifications need to agree with your actual offer.
ALTERNATIVES
I compare the services, evidence and source pages associated with the alternatives shown.
SOURCES
I inspect visible references. If an answer does not reveal a source, I record that gap rather than invent one.
FIT
A mention for a service you do not provide is a problem to correct, even if it looks like visibility.
REPEAT CHECKS
I keep the question and conditions comparable. One favourable answer is not a permanent position.
MENTIONED, BUT MISDESCRIBED?
If ChatGPT gives customers the wrong opening hours, service, price or qualification, I check the claim against information you can verify.
I check the claim, investigate visible sources and fix the records we control.
Where another publisher owns the record, I prepare a factual correction request and track the response.
EXAMPLE: AN APPOINTMENT-ONLY CLINIC
ANSWER TO INVESTIGATE
VERIFIED BUSINESS INFORMATION
Check the claim
Correct the source
Recheck the answer
WHAT YOU GET
I can start with a review, carry out an agreed set of improvements or continue checking after the work is live. The proposal names the tasks and who handles each one.
Questions, observed answers, visible sources, competitor appearances and factual issues, with dates and context.
Specific page, business-information, content or source changes, with the reason each deserves attention.
Updates to the pages or profiles we can access, plus documented requests where a publisher needs to act.
Confirmation of what went live, what remains pending and what appeared when the questions were checked again.
Need a baseline across several platforms? Start with an AI visibility audit.
HOW I WORK
I use DAAOMI to keep the investigation, changes and follow-up connected.
Agree the business, services, customers and questions worth checking.
Review the answers, visible sources and relevant competitors.
Check the facts, pages and technical access behind the issue.
Make the agreed improvements and verify the public result.
Repeat comparable checks and keep pending requests visible.
Use what we find to choose the next useful change.
KEEP THE MEASUREMENT HONEST
ChatGPT answers can vary with the question, product experience, available sources and time. I record those conditions so we know what the comparison means.
I separate mentions, recommendations, source links, website visits and enquiries. They answer different questions. A business can be mentioned without receiving a visit or a lead.
See ongoing AI visibility monitoringWORK I CAN CARRY OUT
Website pages, business details, internal links and agreed profile updates. I can also request corrections from other publishers.
RESULTS I NEED TO OBSERVE
I cannot edit ChatGPT’s answers or choose which businesses it recommends. I report the observed response and what remains uncertain.
WORK DIRECTLY WITH HIMANSHU
I’m Himanshu Swaraj. My 18 years in search marketing help me connect the way your business is described with the pages, services and evidence customers use to choose.
I review the issue with you, explain what needs attention and agree the work before making changes. You know which updates I handle and where your team or another publisher needs to be involved.
Read about my experienceBEFORE WE START
Share the business problem. You do not need a list of prompts or a tool subscription to make an enquiry.
I use the term for checking how ChatGPT describes or surfaces a business, then improving relevant pages, business information and supporting sources. The work starts with your customers’ questions and the answers we can actually observe.
I can investigate gaps and improve the information we control. I cannot guarantee a recommendation, a fixed position or the same answer for every user. ChatGPT controls its responses; my responsibility is the agreed investigation, improvements and follow-up.
I compare the questions, answers and visible sources before drawing a conclusion. The issue may involve unclear services, missing evidence, inconsistent business details or differences in the sources being used. An absent mention alone does not prove a penalty or technical block.
Yes. I check the disputed claim with you, review visible sources, update records we can access and prepare correction requests where another publisher owns the information. The AI fact-correction service explains that work. A source correction does not guarantee an immediate change in ChatGPT.
Technical access is one check, not a promise of inclusion. The AI blocker checker can help inspect observable access signals. I review those alongside the content and answer evidence; the tool cannot reveal ChatGPT’s private selection process.
I keep a dated record of agreed questions, the product experience used, observed answers, visible sources, factual accuracy and competitor appearances. I also review relevant visits and enquiries where tracking is available. I report these separately rather than treating a mention as a sale.
No. I start with the information your business needs to explain accurately. That may mean fixing one service page, clarifying a profile or adding useful evidence. New content needs a purpose and factual review, not a publishing quota.
GEO and AI search optimisation describe broader work across generative search and answer experiences. This page focuses on ChatGPT. The AI search optimisation service covers the wider approach.
I quote after reviewing your website, markets, questions and the work needed. The proposal separates the initial review, implementation and ongoing checks. Software costs, substantial content production and specialist development are identified separately where needed.
Start with your website, priority services, markets and an example of the problem if you have one. I’ll confirm what information or access is needed for the work. Your team verifies business facts and approves changes to your records.
LET’S CHECK WHAT CUSTOMERS MAY SEE
Tell me whether you are missing, misdescribed or being compared with the wrong alternatives.
